Recently, a talk radio host interviewed me about abortion. He asked
me repeatedly, "What about these abortions of babies at 8.5 months!" I
tried to explain that his question had two misnomers that needed
correcting before I could comment further. As this example illustrates,
the terminology surrounding abortion can be treacherous. Errors are
sometimes due to naiveté; at other times the misuse is intentional.
Even medical professionals commonly misuse abortion terminology. Here
are some common problems in the lexicon of abortion.
What is abortion?
Abortion is the removal of a fetus or embryo from the uterus prior to
the stage of viability. (1) Definitions vary as to the timing of
viability, with some using gestational age and others using fetal
weight. In general, independent life outside the uterus becomes
possible around 23-24 weeks of gestation at the earliest. (2)
"Third-trimester" abortion: an oxymoron
Any termination of pregnancy after viability is not an abortion,
according to medical (1) and lay (3) dictionaries. If a pregnancy is
terminated at 8.5 months because of fetal anencephaly (no brain), then
that obstetric intervention is not an abortion. It might be a labor
induction, a hysterotomy (a mini-cesarean delivery), or pregnancy
termination, but not an abortion. This fact is not widely appreciated;
the medical literature has articles with "third-trimester" abortion in
the title. (4)
Abortion opponents have claimed that large numbers
of "third-trimester" abortions were being done. In response,
investigators at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reviewed
all reported pregnancy terminations at 25 weeks and greater in Georgia
over a two-year period. (5) Nearly all reports proved to be clerical
errors. Three pregnancy terminations were correctly coded: Two were
done because of fetal anencephaly, and the indication could not be
determined for the third.
"Late-term" abortion: another oxymoron
In obstetrics, "term" delivery means delivery after 260 to 294 days of
pregnancy (37-42 weeks from last menstrual period). (6) Thus,
"late-term" abortion would be near 42 weeks. As explained above, this
is not an abortion. "Late abortion" is imprecise but acceptable
language, but "late-term" is a misnomer.
Who resides in the pregnant uterus?
The occupant in the uterus is first an embryo. After its organs have
formed (around eight weeks), the embryo becomes a fetus, a status that
it holds until birth. Contrary to the talk radio host, the occupant is
not a baby, child, or infant. (3) Once a fetus is born, it graduates to
one of these designations. Thus, one cannot abort a baby, child, or
infant; they do not reside in the uterus.
Some abortion opponents
use even stranger terms: the "pre-born" or "unborn." In general, we
are characterized by what we are, not by what we are not. I am not
designated "post-born" or "pre-deceased." When I die, my status will
change to cadaver or corpse. However, calling me a "pre-cadaver" or
"un-dead" today would be confusing.
"Partial-birth" abortion: a distinct non-entity
This is a political, not a medical, neologism designed to inflame. The
term is not found in medical texts or coding manuals. It was coined by
opponents to describe an uncommon procedure for second-trimester
abortion, intact dilation and evacuation. A brilliant public relations
ploy, the term conflated two diametrically opposed conclusions of
pregnancy, birth and abortion, in a single term. (7) Thanks to
politicians, a procedure that has been in obstetric texts (6) for
centuries has been made illegal, based esthetics and not on safety.
"Pro-life"?
Opponents of abortion are commonly called "pro-life." In my experience
as a physician, a more accurate designation would be "pro-birth."
Interest in the life of the child (and especially his or her mother) usually dwindles soon thereafter.
Incorrect,
misleading, and inflammatory language obfuscates, rather than
illuminates, the discussion around abortion. Words matter. We should
all choose them carefully.
Cull
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment